Sunday, October 6, 2013

TMZ vs. Civility Blog Test PART 2.

This blog is a continuation of the first TMZ blog, due to the length going over the recommended amount.
            The TMZ blog and comments from readers do adhere to the code in a way that it is not extremely toxic, and has a fine balance of sorts. Death wishes are not tossed back and forth; the most is just offensive bantering. Maybe the Code is being adhered, where the inappropriate comments are being deleted before seen by too many, explaining the lack of overly harsh statements.
            TMZ itself is not an overly polite site, it constantly blogs on the ‘dirty laundry’ of celebrities. Just on the front page, gossip on numerous celebs including Justin Bieber, Kim Kardashin, and Pamela Anderson is displayed, with bold headlines and criminalizing photos. Although this format of blogging may not be the most courteous, it does execute it’s sole task well… It allows an instant explosion of gossip information, article headings and pictures serve well to spoon feed readers the social update needed. In this sense, the blog is very successful in online communication.

            After reading Crystal’s analysis on blogging in Language and the Internet, I can match TMZ to the statements made in the article. Just as Crystal stated, discourse is constantly present in the blog, which seem more like streams of thought. This also touches on the way the blogs are written; non-standard English. Unlike Standard English, the non-standard counterpart departs itself of its norms of orthodox writing; less like a text, more like a conversation in real life. Crystal also claims that blogs increasingly became sources of news instead of reflections of it, this is shown through TMZ, as it’s community of users use the site purely as a celebrity news update.

No comments:

Post a Comment