Wednesday, October 2, 2013

TMZ vs. Civility Blog Test.

                TMZ is a very popular celebrity gossip site that continuously updates it’s archives with the latest stories. Albeit this site is busy, it is certainly not a site I would personally spend my recreational time browsing… Which is exactly why I am reviewing this site against O’Reilly’s draft code of Civility within blogs. Firstly, this site appeals to a certain discourse; mediated entertainment. The discourse community the blog creates is one where the public group that uses the site is those that enjoy gossip of celebrities. Furthermore, in order to contribute to the discussion about a specific article, the community must also obtain a membership. This membership is easily attainable with just an email and username. A site driven by curiosity, and snooping (to a certain degree) will only be successful if they allow the community of readers to post their own thoughts on the situation, no matter how toxic.
                O’Reilly has 6 rules to judge TMZ against, to conclude whether or not this site adheres to the blogger code of conduct, and creates a friendly, hospitable community.
1.       We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we allow on our blog.
Part of this rule entails the constant maintenance of the community’s comments and content so that they are not deemed unacceptable. TMZ clearly does not uphold this, all it took was a quick browse over the comments section, in which users were toxic towards the celebrity being discussed.
2.       We won’t say anything online that we wouldn’t say in person.
                Hopefully my faith in humanity won’t let me down, as I dare to say that I hope none of the       online users would repeat what they posted in the comments.
3.       We connect privately before we respond publicly.
                There is no PM function. So, there is no way to connect privately.
4.       When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take action.
                There is a chance of this rule being fulfilled as the comment section does have a ‘reply’ function,          in which any good Samaritan will use to defend their fellow peers from trolls.
5.       We do not allow anonymous comments
                In a way, there is no anonymous commentators by O’Reilly’s definition of anonymous; supply a             valid email used for contact. However, this email is only visible by the administrators of the site, while the average user does not have access to other peoples email. Only thing users have are the usernames/alias to take as face value.
6.       We ignore the trolls

                People respond to nasty comments with even nastier comments of their own… 

No comments:

Post a Comment